Emily Pellegrini, the AI influencer who fooled the internet
- BRACAI
- 4 hours ago
- 2 min read
Emily Pellegrini is an AI-generated influencer who looks and behaves like a real person.
She is not real. She has no body, no identity, and no public creator. She was launched in late 2023.
Emily Pellegrini is a computer-generated character designed to look like a high-end Instagram model. She first appeared in late 2023 and grew rapidly by blending perfectly into the existing influencer aesthetic: travel, lifestyle, glamour, and subtle sexualization.
In her early growth phase, many followers believed she was human. Professional athletes, entrepreneurs, and public figures interacted with her as if she were real. That ambiguity fueled virality and media attention.
Today, the account is transparent. Emily is clearly labeled as an AI influencer, and her creator is credited publicly. Despite that, the account continues to grow. This makes Emily Pellegrini a useful case study not of deception, but of how AI influencers mature from novelty into systems.
Quick facts: Emily Pellegrini
Is Emily real? No. She is fully AI-generated
Creator: @professor.ep
First appeared: 2023
Niche: lifestyle, travel, glamour
Positioning: openly labeled AI influencer
Brand safety: low to medium (sexualized content)
Background of Emily Pellegrini
Emily Pellegrini was created by an anonymous creator operating under the handle Professor EP, who now openly positions himself as an AI influencer expert.
The character was designed using generative image models optimized for photorealism. Visually, Emily matches the statistical average of what performs best on Instagram: youthful appearance, symmetrical features, idealized body proportions, and aspirational locations.
From the start, the goal was not storytelling or activism. It was attention.
Emily’s early success came from how seamlessly she fit into Instagram’s existing visual language. Her content did not look experimental or “AI-styled”. It looked familiar. That familiarity allowed her to pass as human long enough to trigger organic sharing, media coverage, and curiosity.
The growth phase: “is she real?”
Emily’s breakout moment came when users began questioning her authenticity.
Journalists covered her as an example of men being “fooled” by AI models. Screenshots circulated of verified accounts and high-profile individuals messaging her privately. This phase created a feedback loop:
realism created confusion
confusion created virality
virality created legitimacy
At this stage, ambiguity was an asset. The account benefited from silence and plausible deniability. That is common in early AI influencer growth patterns.
But ambiguity does not scale forever.
The pivot: disclosure without collapse
Instead of clinging to deception, the creator pivoted.
Emily is now explicitly labeled as AI. The bio states it. Videos reference it. One reel states plainly: “AI influencers are going to be everywhere. We’re still early. Wake up.”
This shift did not kill engagement.
Why? Because the value proposition changed.
Emily stopped being “a girl you might meet” and became “a system you can learn from”. The audience expanded from followers to include creators, marketers, and builders who are curious about how this works.
This is the critical lesson: transparency can extend the lifecycle of an AI influencer instead of ending it.
Want your own AI influencers for your business?
Tell us your niche, market and goals. We will get back to you shortly.